
Vergabit
Vergabit collects public IT tenders, extracts the eligibility and knock-out criteria with AI, and holds them against your company profile, before you read the tender documents.


Where the data comes from
Procedures come from the EU official journal TED, the German Bekanntmachungsservice and the state procurement platforms. The product names ten sources and updates daily.
- EU · TED
- Deutschland · BKMS
- VERGABE_NRW
- VERGABE_RLP
- VERGABE_NIEDERSACHSEN
- VERGABE_WESTFALEN
- VERGABE_METROPOLERUHR
- VERGABE_RHEINLAND
From search hit to pre-check
- 01
Find tenders
Active IT procedures from ten sources, sorted by technology theme, updated daily.
- 02
Detect requirements
Mandatory requirements and open check points are extracted in structured form from the available documents: certificates, references, team size, revenue.
- 03
Compare against the company profile
The company profile you stored once is held against the detected requirements: met, open, or a hard blocker.
Why
Sample text at the intended length. Three or four sentences on how Vergabit came about: what made you notice that sifting through tenders eats too much time, what you first did by hand, and when it became clear this would turn into a product. Concrete, in your own words, no marketing voice.
Why you built Vergabit. Nothing public on the site states a motive, so nothing is written here. These are your words, in a few sentences.
- What was the concrete moment the problem became visible?
- Who was it for first, yourself or someone else?
- What annoyed you about the existing options?
Insight
Sample text at the intended length. This is where the one thing you want to share publicly goes, technical or creative. Three or four sentences: what the problem was, how you solved it, and what surprised you. Enough substance that a peer nods, and short enough that nobody drops out.
One technical or creative insight you want to share publicly. None of it may come from the repo, only what you choose to tell.
- How does a PDF turn into a set of detected eligibility criteria?
- How are ten sources merged and duplicates caught?
- Why is light the default view?
- Why is the EU claim deliberately limited to hosting, database and email?
Screens





Pricing
14-day trial
0 €
Full access, one company profile for the automatic pre-check.
Pro
49 €
For individual IT service providers: one company profile, market comparison, knock-out criteria, weekly digest, watchlist with deadline reminders, MCP connector.
Max
149 €
For agencies and consultants: everything in Pro, up to 20 company profiles, separate watchlists per client.
What else is in there
Where the product stops
Vergabit does not replace a procurement-law review. The results are a pre-check; the original documents govern. Budget and federal state are deliberately not displayed, because the official sources carry too little reliable data for them.
- Data and hosting
- Hosting, database and email run in the EU, GDPR-compliant. The AI functions run at Anthropic in the USA, under EU standard contractual clauses, without training use and without the customer's company name. The claim on the site is worded exactly that narrowly.
- MCP connector
- On the paid plans, your own AI agent connects to Vergabit through an MCP connector: it searches procedures itself, checks criteria and maintains the watchlist.
- Editorial and findability
- 14 guide articles, 19 theme pages, plus llms.txt and llms-full.txt. Answer-engine crawlers are explicitly allowed in robots.txt.
- Interface
- The interface can be switched to English; the indexed pages are German. Light and dark are both built, light is the default.
[ZITAT · LUIS]One short quote that fits this product.
Luis Godoy Alvarez